Peer Review Policy
The peer review process is integral to maintaining the quality of published research. At the Mental Health: Research and Challenges, we ensure that only high-quality, scientifically sound manuscripts are published. Peer review is an objective process central to good scholarly publishing and is conducted by experts in the relevant field.
Initial Manuscript Evaluation
The Editor conducts an initial evaluation of all manuscripts. While rare, it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts may be rejected if they are not original, contain significant scientific flaws, are poorly written, or do not fall within the scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum standards are sent for peer review.
Type of Peer Review
We employ a double-blind review process, where both the authors and referees remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process. This ensures impartiality and objectivity.
Selection of Referees
Referees are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field of the manuscript. Our database of qualified referees is continuously updated to ensure the best possible match for each paper.
Referee Reports
Referees are asked to assess the following aspects of the manuscript:
- Originality and innovation of the research
- Soundness and appropriateness of the methodology
- Adherence to ethical guidelines
- Clarity of presentation and how well the results support the conclusions
- Correctness and comprehensiveness of the references to previous relevant work
Language correction is not a part of the peer review process, but referees may suggest language improvements if they deem it necessary.
Review Process Duration
The time taken for the review process depends on the responsiveness of the referees. If the reports from referees contradict each other, or if there is an unnecessary delay in receiving reports, additional expert opinions may be sought. Once the review process is complete, the Editor will send the author a decision along with the reviewers’ comments, which may include verbatim feedback.
Final Report
The final decision, either to accept or reject the manuscript, will be communicated to the author along with any comments from the referees, which may include verbatim feedback.
Editor’s Decision is Final
While referees provide valuable input, the Editor has the final authority to make decisions regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript.